Three-parent
babies risk the future of the human race and put Britain at odds with
EU law, politicians from across Europe have warned.
MPs
from Italy claim the 'human species as a whole' will be affected by the
controversial technique, while MEPs in Brussels warn it violates 'human
dignity and integrity of the person'.
But
ahead of a vote on the law in the House of Lords, former Archbishop of
Canterbury Lord Carey dismissed the 'unfathomable' opposition and vowed
to defy the Church's line to back the idea.
Graphic shows how the three-parent baby process works. However critics
argue there is a small risk of diseased mitochondria could be carried
over too (point 4)
MPs last
month voted in favour of Britain becoming the first country in the world
to permit the creation of IVF babies with genetic material from three
different people, despite warnings from some experts warn it would be an
'historic mistake'.
Scientists
at Newcastle University have developed a way of swapping the
mother-to-be's diseased mitochondria – the 'batteries' that give cells
energy – with healthy ones from another woman's egg.
Supporters
stress that mitochondrial DNA is 0.054 per cent of a person's overall
DNA and none of the nuclear DNA which determines personal
characteristics and traits.
David
Cameron backed the law change, insisting it was not 'playing God' but
the chance to hep parents have a 'healthy and happy baby'.
But
some 50 MEPs have written to the Prime Minister calling for him to
withdraw the legislation, which is due to be debated in the Lords.
Slovakian
MEP Miroslav Mikolásik has called on the European Commission to 'take
steps' over Britain's 'lack of compliance' with EU law.
In
the letter he and 49 other MEPs said: 'We are writing to you to express
our profound concern at the intention of the UK to permit the
modification of the human genome.
'Your proposals violate the fundamental standards of human dignity and integrity of the person.'
Meanwhile a group of Italian MPs have also called on the House of Lords to vote against the plans.
In
a letter to The Times, they warned the technique 'could have
uncontrollable and unforeseeable consequences, affecting future
generations and modifying genetic heritage in an irreversible way,
inevitably affecting the human species as a whole'.
The
letter added: 'The greater part of the scientific community maintain
that the scientific data currently available is insufficient to even
consider intervention on human subjects, and there cannot therefore be
any guarantee for the safety of any eventual off-spring'.
However,
supporters of the technique have rejected the idea that the global
scientific community is opposed to mitochondrial donation.
Lord
Carey said he was surprised that Church of England in the Lords were
preparing to support a delaying motion from the Roman Catholic peer Lord
Deben.
In
an article in the Mail on Sunday, he said: 'It would be received by
families as a cruel and unnecessary delay after seven years of
investigation, consultation, parliamentary discussion and scrutiny.'
He
added: 'Much opposition is coming from well-organised campaigns from
Catholics from Latin America and Eastern Europe. But if we cannot make
any alteration, then we will deny ourselves the possibility of ever
improving life for those who suffer from these intractable conditions.
'Turning
our backs on these advances is uncaring and unloving. We live in an
exciting time for medical research and we must support caring scientists
and doctors with the resources and proper regulations to do their
work.'
What???
No comments:
Post a Comment